The Southern Judiciary and the Sovereignty of Native American Nations: A Comprehensive Exploration

The relationship between the Southern judiciary and Native American nations has been a complex and often contentious one, marked by both conflict and cooperation. In recent decades, however, there has been a growing recognition of the sovereignty of Native American nations and the importance of respecting their rights. This shift is reflected in a number of landmark court rulings, which have affirmed the sovereignty of Native American nations and their right to self-governance.

The Legal Ideology of Removal: The Southern Judiciary and the Sovereignty of Native American Nations (Studies in the Legal History of the South Ser.)

by Tim Alan Garrison

4.7 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	3156 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Print length	:	336 pages
Paperback	:	260 pages
Item Weight	:	1.49 pounds
Dimensions	:	5.5 x 0.8 x 8.4 inches

FREE

Historical Context

The history of the relationship between the Southern judiciary and Native American nations is long and complex. In the early days of the United States, the federal government pursued a policy of assimilation, seeking to force Native Americans to abandon their traditional ways of life and adopt the values and customs of white society. This policy was often enforced through the courts, which were used to strip Native Americans of their land and resources.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the federal government began to shift its policy towards Native Americans, adopting a more paternalistic approach. This new policy was reflected in the creation of Indian reservations, which were intended to provide Native Americans with a safe haven where they could preserve their culture and traditions. However, the federal government also maintained a strong degree of control over reservations, often interfering in the internal affairs of Native American nations.

Landmark Court Rulings

In recent decades, there has been a growing recognition of the sovereignty of Native American nations and the importance of respecting their rights. This shift is reflected in a number of landmark court rulings, which have affirmed the sovereignty of Native American nations and their right to self-governance.

One of the most important of these rulings was the 1978 Supreme Court case of Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe. In this case, the Court held that Native American tribes have the inherent authority to exercise self-government, including the power to tax non-Indians on their reservations. This decision was a major victory for Native American sovereignty and helped to establish the principle that tribes are not merely wards of the federal government, but rather independent nations with their own inherent powers.

Another important Supreme Court ruling came in 2009 in the case of City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York. In this case, the Court held that the State of New York could not tax cigarettes sold by the Oneida Indian Nation on its reservation. This decision was a major victory for the Oneida Nation and reaffirmed the principle of tribal sovereignty.

The relationship between the Southern judiciary and Native American nations has been a complex and often contentious one. However, in recent decades, there has been a growing recognition of the sovereignty of Native American nations and the importance of respecting their rights. This shift is reflected in a number of landmark court rulings, which have affirmed the sovereignty of Native American nations and their right to self-governance.

These rulings are a major victory for Native American sovereignty and represent a significant step forward in the relationship between Native American nations and the United States government. They provide a strong foundation for the future and will help to ensure that the rights of Native American nations are respected.

Call to Action

If you are interested in learning more about the relationship between the Southern judiciary and Native American nations, I encourage you to read "The Southern Judiciary and the Sovereignty of Native American Nations." This book provides a comprehensive overview of the history of this relationship and the landmark court rulings that have shaped it. It is an essential read for anyone who wants to understand the complex and often contentious relationship between Native American nations and the United States government.

The Legal Ideology of Removal: The Southern Judiciary and the Sovereignty of Native American Nations (Studies in the Legal History of the South Ser.)

by Tim Alan Garrison

4.7 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	3156 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Print length	:	336 pages
Paperback	:	260 pages
Item Weight	:	1.49 pounds
Dimensions	:	5.5 x 0.8 x 8.4 inches

FREE